Showing posts with label Creational order. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Creational order. Show all posts

Monday, December 16, 2024

MISREADINGS IN GENESIS 1-3: “ORIGINAL SIN” AND THE KNOWLEDGE OF GOOD AND EVIL(1)


Sin and Death
Death, the consequence of sin, is the encroachment of chaos in to God’s intended order.  In my last post, I noted that the “Fall” is not a biblical term; and, unless qualified (see "Moral Evil" below), it is not a biblical concept.  Rather, the so-called “Fall” story, the narrative of Genesis 3, is about the loss of the opportunity of immortality,2 (although there is more to learn from this narrative).  Adam and Eve had access to immortality through the Tree of Life, but they lost that access when they ate of the fruit of the Tree of the Knowledge of Good and Evil. 
     The first point to observe is that death, mortality, belongs to the realm of chaos.  In the second post in this short series, I explored how the first creation story (Gen 1:1-2:3) starts with initial physical chaos, elements that are contra life.3  God’s creative activity by the Spirit is to breathe order into the midst of that chaos, bringing it under God’s reign, so that life may be produced and sustained.  Working to the opposite effect, Adam’s and Eve’s sin places them under the reign of death; that is, chaos encroached into God’s intended order.  Chaos/death is the consequence of sin.

Moral Evil
Second, it should be noted that just as the first creation account begins with unexplained surd evil (physical chaos), similarly, Genesis 3 opens with unexplained moral evil/chaos in the figure of a serpent.  The serpent is an ancient Near Eastern symbol of chaos.  Temptation is about listening to the allure of the false promises (of chaos) rather than submitting to God and the creational order.  Such temptation, then, has always been present as a part of human experience, with the result that Paul can say, "all have sinned and fallen short of the glory of God” (Rom 3:23).  In a qualified sense, then, we can speak of Genesis 3 as a fall story; it narrates how humans fall short of God’s intended order.

Original Sin
Third, Augustine’s popularized notion of Adam’s seed becoming corrupted and “original sin” being passed down seminally misses the point of Genesis 3.4  As long as the man and woman walked in harmony with their Creator, order was maintained.  However, they succumbed to temptation.  The temptation of original sin is clearly stated by the chaos figure of the serpent: “You (plural) will become like God."5 The temptation is to usurp God’s role and to reverse the creational order by elevating oneself to divine status; that is living by self-rule rather than under the divine rule of one’s Creator.  All “sin” (singular) originates from the desire of self-rule.

The Knowledge of Good and Evil
Fourth, the phrase "the knowledge of good and evil” refers to concept that is over debated. Its meaning here should be clear enough.  The idiom “to know good and evil” (yd’ tov wr’) in used in the case of a child coming of age and being recognized as a moral agent; that is, as an adult (see Deut 1:39).  [Traditionally in Judaism this is by the age of 13 for a male.]  Therefore, some scholars have postulated – wrongly – that Adam’s and Eve’s sin was a good thing that brought them into maturity!  However, in the context of the serpent-chaos figure tempting them to “become like God," the conclusion must be drawn that Adam and Eve wanted self-accountability rather than accountability to God. The idiom may be parallel to a child moving from parent-accountability to self-accountability; but, in our text it does not signify maturity.  When Adam and Eve eat of the fruit of the Tree of Knowledge of 
Good and Evil, they are rebelling against God and the creational order.  Again, the narrative portrait displays that sin is about self-rule, running one’s own life.6

Consequences of Sin: Chaos and Death, A Reversal of Creation
The consequences of Adam’s and Eve’s rebellious disobedience (Gen 3:7-24) is that order and harmony are lost.  Chaos encroaches into their relationship with God (8-13) into their relationship with the natural world – fruit-bearing is laborious (16-19) – and into their relationship with each other (16).7  That is, sin results in reversing the creational order, an important motif that is found in the OT prophets.8 Moreover, due to their rebellious state of "becoming like God" in terms of asserting self-accountability, God bans them from the Tree of Life and they have to face their mortality (3:22-24).  Humans come under the reign of sin and death that Paul writes of in Romans 5.

Summary
Genesis 3 portrays the nature of sin and the condition of humanity. We readily succumb to temptation, to the false promises of self-rule rather than accepting the creational order of walking with God under God's rule. That is sin. Such sin yields to the encroachment of chaos and reverses the creational order. It brings discord into all of our relationships, with God, with others, and even with our natural environment. It brings us under the reign of death.

Lord, you know how often I try to rule my own life. It is folly. It has only brought me disorder, discontentment, and despair. Help me to continually seek your face, your will, you pleasure, your gracious rule in my life. Amen.
-------
 

1. This is the last of a short series of posts on Genesis 1-3.  For the introduction, see Nov. 22, 2024, “Misreadings in Genesis 1-3: Background.”
2. Dec. 10, 2024, “Misreadings in Genesis 1-3: Why Humans Die.”
3. Nov. 22, 2024, “Misreadings in Genesis 1-3: Order in the Midst of Chaos.”
4. A form of Augustine’s theology is often read into Romans 5:12-19.  I invite the reader to read that text afresh AFTER reading the following discussion.
5. The term here, elohim, can legitimately mean “gods/divine beings” or “God.”  Since the narrative starting at 2:4 has not to this point explicitly mentioned other heavenly beings, and Adam and Eve know but one God, I would translate it as “God.”
6. Perhaps for another “devotional,” one could bring in the biblical notions of discernment and the “heart.”  Separated from God, not only do humans lack sufficient knowledge to discern good from evil (2Sam 19:35) without hearts that seek God, they will not volitionally choose good over evil.  Moreover, as their hearts become hardened, they become increasingly addicted to sin.
7. See post of “Misreadings in Genesis 1-3: The Role of Woman.”
8. Recognizing this motif of the prophets is also key to understanding Paul's train of thought in Romans 1:18-32.



Friday, December 6, 2024

MISREADINGS IN GENESIS 1-3: THE ROLE OF WOMAN(1)

This thought follows up to the previous one on our calling as ones made in the image of God and is important if not very “devotional.”  Despite clear biblical texts to the contrary, I still hear some church-people who talk of the subordinate role of women to men.  Genesis 1-3 addresses this issue.  In the narrative of Gen 1:1-2:3, when God states that he will make humanity in God’s image, God does so, male and female (1:26-28).  Both represent God.  That was “good” (Hebrew tov), which here ties in with order.

In the second narrative that begins at 2:4, when God desired for the man to have a “like-corresponding-to-him (kngd) helper” (‘zr), no existing creature would do (2:18-20).  Neither of the Hebrew terms in the quoted expression imply subordination: the first term has the notion of a proper counterpart, and the second, translated “helper,” is a term that may be used in reference to the divine aid of God (Psalm 121:1).  To provide such an entity for the man, God does not create (br’) new kind of being.  Rather, God extracts a section from the side of the man and forms (bnh) the women from it.  The point is that the woman is the exact same essence as the man and not a new kind of creature.  The man acknowledges this fact with a wordplay in Hebrew that works as well in English, "This one at last is bone of my bones and flesh of my flesh; this one will be called 'woman' (isshah) for she was taken out of man (ish)" (Gen 2:23).  [The explanatory note about marriage in 2:24 (“that is why a man (ish) leaves…and is united to his woman (isshah), and they become one flesh”) is not about sexual intercourse, but about how the unity of the two complementary humans form a kinship entity.]

When one gets to the Chapter Three, after Eve’s and Adam’s act of disobedience, 3:16 is sometime used to defend the subordination of women, “And toward your husband [will be] your intent, but he should rule over you.”  This text does not command that husbands rule over their wives.  First, this statement presents the effect of a cause.  It is presented as a consequence of chaos encroaching on their relationship due to their rebellion toward God.  A major biblical principle of creation theology exhibited in Genesis 3, a principle particularly picked up by the prophets, is that when one defies the Creator of order, chaos returns and impedes the proper creational order.2  In Gen 3:16, chaos hinders the originally intended relational order between a husband and wife.  This resultant state is not the divine goal.  Those who seek to obey God and to bring order into chaos will work for a harmonious relationship, one in which male and female are both in the image of God and are both expected to bring order into the domains of the earth.

Second, although the Hebrew of 3:16 is rather vague and difficult to translate, a parallel text in wording, but not in implied tense and mood, regarding Cain and sin sheds light on 3:16: “And toward you [is] its [sin’s] desire (tshwqh), but you must rule over it” (4:7).  This parallel construction to 3:16 reveals that the word for “desire” (tshwqh) of the women in 3:16, which can have a positive connotation (Song of Sol 7:11, Eng. 7:10), is here something negative.  Like the negative “desire” of sin personified, it should be thwarted.  Due to this parallel text in 4:7, the NET translates our text, “You [the woman] will want to control your husband, but he will dominate you" (Gen. 3:16).  Moreover, this reading makes sense in light of the preceding event in which the woman succumbed to the temptation of the serpent and the man, instead of refusing her offer and thwarting sin, willingly followed.

Application:
In God’s creational order, males and females were made in the image of God to represent God.  In this creational order, the woman is of the same essence as the man and not a lesser or defective being (as in ancient Greek thought).  Together male and female complement one another.  Those who seek God should not take the consequential chaos of sin as a state to maintain.  Rather, as ones created in the image of God, they should strive to being order into that chaos.  Complementarily made men and women should work together to obey and serve their Creator.

Lord, once again I see that you want order and light, not chaos and darkness.  Guide me and your Church to bring order into chaos, particularly as we respect our complementary helpers.  Amen.
------

1. This post of Dec. 5, 2024, was amended on Dec. 9, 2024 to address a comment asking for clarification.  In regard to the background on this post, see the previous posts, Nov. 22, 2024, “Misreadings in Genesis 1-3: Background” and Dec. 5, 2024, “Misreadings in Genesis 1-3: Our Calling: The “Image of God.”
2. This principle of sin causing the encroachment of chaos will be developed in a subsequent post.

THE ASCENSION OF JESUS: IT MATTERS (Phil 2:9-11)

In some of my posts, I have objected to a characteristic of pop-level Christianity that focuses almost exclusively on the death of Jesus (un...