Showing posts with label Matthew 5. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Matthew 5. Show all posts

Sunday, January 5, 2025

CHRISTIAN RIGHTS?

In my current culture, many people calling themselves “Evangelical Christians” are grasping for power and exaltation in the form of political control through secular, civil authorities.  They demand that the civil authorities protect “their rights.”  On the civil side, it sometimes appears they want to elevate themselves over the constitutional rights of those with different beliefs.  On the biblical side, there is no manifesto of Christian “rights.”  (Such behavior, of course, is the opposite of the nature of the Kingdom of God.)

Jesus’ response to civil authorities was, as Philip explains to the Ethiopian, to be “led like a sheep to the slaughter…in humiliation he was deprived of justice” (Act 8:31-34, quoting Isa 53:7-8).  Jesus refused to rely on his own access to divine power to protect his rights: “Do you think I cannot call on my Father, and he will at once put at my disposal more than twelve legions of angels?” (Mat 26:53 NIV).

This same Jesus proclaims that “blessed” (makarios1) people are “the poor in spirit… those who mourn… the meek (praus2)… those who hunger and thirst for righteousness… the merciful… the pure in heart… the peacemakers… and the persecuted” (Matt 5:1-12).  Such people are the opposite of the worldly powerful and exalted.

Jesus describes the Beatitude people further as “salt” and “light” (Matt 5:13-16).  Both salt and light work their wonders of preserving and illuminating without force, without taking control, but by being who they are called to be.  Salt and light serve for the good of others.  When Jesus’ people act as salt and light, they produce “good deeds” that result in people praising God (vs 16).

Lord Jesus, I give any “rights” that I think I might have to you.  Help motivate me to serve people by being salt and light to them.  Amen.
----------
1.  I have a hypothesis that I sometime want to explore about makarios.  The Greek is a translation of the Hebrew ʾshry, both of which are translated as either “blessed” or “happy.”  But the Hebrew term seems to come from the word ʾshr which can have the sense of “going straight,” is used frequently in wisdom sayings, and where the verb form is found in Pro 9:6 is about going in the way of understanding.  My hypothesis is that both the Hebrew and Greek have the sense of “going in the right (godly) way.”
2.  Important to this point is the term for “meek” (praus) in Matt 5:5, “Blessed are the meek, for they will inherit the earth.”  Too many Christian Internet sites want to claim, without citing support, that that “meek” is a quality of a strong, mighty, warhorse that is under control.  (See the discussion debunking this notion by Marg Mowczko, “The Greek Word 'Praus' and Meek Warhorses” at https://www.gutenberg.org/cache/epub/1176/pg1176-images.html)  The sense if the term is “gentle/mild.”  Moreover, Jesus appears to be quoting Psalm 37:11, “But the meek (Hebrew ʽnw) will inherit the land” (NIV).  The Hebrew equivalent for Greek praus-related words are words that come from the Hebrew root ‘nh, the action of bowing down.  The noun form in Ps 37:11 carries the notion of being humble.  A related noun ‘ny in Zech 9:9 describes the Messiah: "... See, your king comes to you, righteous and victorious, lowly (‘ny) and riding on a donkey, on a colt, the foal of a donkey" (NIV).  If, as it seems likely, Greek praus is being used for Hebrew ‘nw by Jewish NT authors, then the idea of meekness describes someone who is humble/lowly before God and others.  As with the rest of the Beatitude qualities, it is contrary to exalting oneself over others.

Wednesday, October 25, 2023

CALLING SOMEONE A “FOOL”: NAME-CALLING IN MATTHEW 5:22

 “Idiot dwiver” was one of my daughter’s earliest expressions.  Something she learned from riding in the car with me.  (Whoops.)  I told my wife that this was better than profanity.  Is it?  What does Jesus mean in Matt 5:21 – 22?

"You have heard that the ancients were told, 'You shall not commit murder' and 'Whoever commits murder shall be liable to the court.'  "But I say to you that everyone who is angry with his brother shall be guilty before the court; and whoever shall say to his brother, 'Raca,' [empty head] shall be guilty before the supreme court; and whoever shall say, 'You fool,' shall be guilty enough to go into Gehenna.”

Background: In the immediate context, Jesus has said that he came to correctly fulfill (apply) the Law and the Prophets.*  His following example uses hyperbole by shockingly putting anger and name-calling in the category of murder!  He is a attacking a casuistic approach to applying God’s law; that is: in the case of A, do X; in the case of B, do Y; in the case of C, do Z.#  Instead, Jesus is pointing to the heart, the moral foundation, from which murder comes.  Submitting to God, as properly learned through the Law, was to address the heart.

This text got me thinking about name-calling.  Names were important in this culture.  Parents might give an aspirational name (Eleazar, “God [is] helper”).  A person’s name might be changed to accompany a change of character or calling (Abram to Abraham).  Not naming someone in a story was a slur (the unnamed kinsman redeemer in Ruth who rejects his responsibility).  I think, too, of the lawyer, who refused to say “Samaritan” in answer to Jesus’ question (Luke 10:36 – 37).  In terms of magic/witchcraft, knowing and using someone’s name gave some leverage.  And, as mentioned in a previous post, “How is the Bible the Word of God” (July 30, 2023), words were important in this culture.  They were uttered by a person’s breath=spirit and, therefore, had some efficacious force to them.  Cursing and taking an oath were quite serious.

Application:  As I move to personal application, I am reminded that name-calling (“idiot dwiver”) reveals more about me than it does about the other person.  It reveals that I am willing to belittle other people and dehumanize them by reducing them to a pejorative label, one that undoubtedly makes me feel superior – “Surely, I am not like that (blank) person!”  Such a heart/moral foundation is moving me away from the cultivation of mercy, empathy, and compassion, moving me away from the intended fulfillment of the Law and Prophets.  I think that was what Jesus was getting at.

Lord, what I say reveals – to my shame -- my heart.  Forgive me.  Please cleanse my heart and my words.  Grant that I might grow in the fruit of the Spirit.  Amen.

 *I found an interesting open-source article by Michal Bar-Asher Seigal, “Matthew 5:22: The Insult ‘Fool’ and the Interpretation of the Law in Christian and Rabbinic Sources.”  The author concludes that in the context of Second Temple debates about Torah that Jesus is speaking about ridiculing someone for their interpretation of Torah.  That is possible but seems too specific in light of the other teachings in Jesus’ “Sermon on the Mount” (Matt 5 – 7).
#To see that Jesus is using exaggeration for shock value here, one might note that Jesus does call someone a “fool” (moros) in Mt 23:17.

THE ASCENSION OF JESUS: IT MATTERS (Phil 2:9-11)

In some of my posts, I have objected to a characteristic of pop-level Christianity that focuses almost exclusively on the death of Jesus (un...