The biblical word groups involving justice, judgment, righteousness, law, etc. are frequently misunderstood.* Pop-Christianity influenced by Reformed theology and Western individualism have led readers, including NT theologians, to view these word groups from a limited forensic and individualized perspective. What is typically lost is the broader context of relational order. Examples:
The Hebrew word mishpat, “justice,” can be used narrowly in the sense of criminal justice, but more broadly, it is about equitable and harmonious social order. Justice is ultimately about creating an orderly societal relationships.
The Greek word krino, “to judge” is broadly about distinguishing between order and chaos, right and wrong, etc. although it can be used specifically about a court-setting decision. A person must understand the context in order to understand when one not to judge (condemn) (Matt 7:1) and when one is to judge (discern/distinguish) (1Cor 2:15; Luke 12:57).
The Hebrew word tzedakah and the Greek word dikaiosune,
both usually translated “righteousness” (or poorly, “justified”) are not
foremost a forensic evaluation of a person’s abstract legal status. These are relational, behavioral terms. The “righteousness of God” refers to the
integrity of God in God’s dealings with people. When Abraham
entrusts himself to God, and God considers/reckons his commitment as
“righteousness,” the point is that Abraham’s faith (entrustment) is judged by
God as establishing a “right” relationship (Gen 15:6). Paul relies heavily on this model in Romans
4 to explain the nature of faith and being declared righteous by the righteous God (see, too 3:26).
The Hebrew torah, “law,” (translated in Greek by nomos),
again, is not narrowly forensic. “Torah”
(etymologically having the sense of propelling something in a direction) is
used throughout the OT wisdom literature for directional guidance, teaching, but
it also can be applied to genres of history, regulations, and exhortations.
When the people of Israel entrusted themselves
to God in a covenant relationship, the Torah/Law that was given to them was primarily
to guide them to righteous behavior.# It is vital to note that covenant (relational commitment) precedes law!
For Paul, the Torah/Law was never bad.
However, by pointing to righteous practices, Torah also reveals what is
sin (Rom 3:20). For example, Jesus’ parable-like
story of the sheep and the goats (Matt 25:31-46; see Isaiah 58:6-10) makes it
clear that the failure to practice righteous behavior is a sinful rejection of
the Lord. Still, true righteous behavior
is a reflection of the heart. Even
Gentiles, who do not have the Law, may have it on their hearts (Rom 2:14-15;
see, too 28-29). Obviously, of course,
simply outwardly doing right things (works of the Law) does not mean that a
person has entrusted themselves to God. No, covenantal commitment/entrusting/faith comes before law!
Moreover, for Paul, “believing into” (pisteo eis) Christ" establishes a relationship that empowers a person by the
Spirit to desire and practice righteousness.
The Law itself cannot so empower a person. First, is the restored relationship by the grace of God through faith/entrustment.
(I would encourage people to read passages such as Roman 1-4 with these broader definitions in mind.)
Application: Good Israelite/Jewish religion starts with a
heart that entrusts itself to God and desires to walk in righteousness, to
which the Law in part guided them. “Fruits
of righteous” were/are expected from such a person. A person was not “declared righteous” (in
right relationship with God) by going through the motions of the Law. This relational understanding of justice,
righteousness, and law applies to the extension of the divine promises to
Gentiles, to all those “believing into” Christ.
Popular Bible interpretations of “getting saved” by some outward act (coming
to the altar, saying “the” prayer, being baptized, etc.) so that forensically
one’s sins are “imputed” onto Jesus and Jesus’ righteousness is “imputed” onto
the person, resulting in a “get-out-of-jail/hell card” are terribly shallow and
misleading. Through Christ, we are called into a restored, right, relationship with our Creator.
Lord, as I seek to entrust myself to you, purify my heart and lead me in
righteousness for your glory. Amen.
*My devotional studies got me sidetracked from Psalm 24. I will come back to it sometime as well as with follow-up posts to this one.
#Of course the Law does much more. For example, the dress and eating codes were
primarily ways of reminding Israelites of their call to by holy (set apart) as
God’s people. Much of the symbolism behind
those laws involved cultural symbols of chaos vs. order. They had many daily reminders that they were called
to align themselves with order, God’s order.
This is vitally important, especially the ORDER. God did not say, "Here are the rules. If you keep them I will deliver you out of Egypt." God delivered the people out of Egypt and then said, "Here's what it looks like to be My people."
ReplyDeleteSharyn Dowd
Yes. I will address this in the next post 8/30 on Atonement (Rodney)
Delete