What Fall Story?
The “Fall” is not a biblical term; and, unless qualified, it is not
a biblical concept. The so-called “Fall”
story, the narrative of Genesis 3, explains the loss of the opportunity
to immortality. Well before there was
such people as Hebrews/Israelites, ancient myths addressed why humans are not
immortal. For example, in the ancient
Mesopotamian myth, “The Epic of Gilgamesh,” probably going back to the
Sumerians, a snake ate the plant of immortal life before Gilgamesh could. In another Mesopotamian myth, “Adapa,” a god
tricks him into not drinking the water of immortality. The Bible, along with its very different
worldview, presents a contrasting account:
God had given Adam and Eve access to immortality through the Tree of
Life, but they lost that access when they ate of the fruit of the Tree of the
Knowledge of Good and Evil.2 As
a consequence, they/humanity face their mortality.
Created Mortal, Not Immortal
The first point to note is that in Genesis, humans are never said
to have been created immortal. That
belief came into Christian thinking through the acceptance of Greek
dualism. (In Greek thought, humans were
composed of a decomposable body and an eternal soul, the latter possessing the
essence of life. Since this line of
Greek thought believed nothing could be lost or gained in an eternal cosmos,
the soul had to be immortal; the essence of people is immortal.) The Old Testament
presents a different picture of the nature of humans, a wholistic one. In the second narrative in Genesis, God takes
soil, breathes into it – “breath” being related to “spirit,” and the man
becomes a living “soul” (nephesh)
(2:7). The Hebrew concept of nephesh/soul is different from the Greek
concept. The Hebrew term is related to the
bodily passages through which the breath flows.
A breathing animal, like a person, is also called a nephesh/soul. There is no Greek dualism of an eternal soul
entering a disposable body. In the
biblical anthropology, people are not alive apart from being embodied. [For this reason, the first Christians would
not have accepted a figurative resurrection.
To be resurrected, Jesus had to be embodied, even if that body was a “spiritual
body,” as per Paul’s discussion in 1Cor 15:42-44.] Moreover, there is nothing in the Gen 1-3 about
humans being immortal. With the
cessation of breathing, a person expires (“breathes out”), dies.3 In this biblical revised version of ancient
myth, however, the man had free access to the Tree of Life (2:9,16); that is, the
man originally possessed the opportunity of immortality.
Facing Mortality
God told the man that if he ate from the Tree of the Knowledge of
Good and Evil, he would die. Although
there are other key consequences to Adam’s disobedience [to be treated in the
next blog post], the main one here that parallels the ancient Near Eastern
myths is that now Adam and Eve face their mortality. In the rebellious state of having chosen to
eat of the Tree of the Knowledge of Good and Evil, God bans them from the Tree
of Life and from the Garden of Eden in which they had closely walked and talked
with God (3:22-24). Now, apart from God,
they must die.
Application
Sin results in death. Pop-level
Christianity should take a fresh look at New Testament texts regarding the
consequences of sin and take them more literally than figuratively. When Paul states that “the wages of sin is
death” (Rom 6:23), he means it literally.
When John’s Gospel states that “that whoever believes in him [God’s Son]
shall not perish (John 3:16), “perish” is meant literally. Throughout the NT, the judgement on sin is
death, literally. All have sinned; all
face death. The biblical logic is
crystal clear: cut off from the Source of Life (represented by walking and
talking with God in the Garden) and being banned from the Tree of Life, leaves
humanity facing death. How could it
not? This is why Paul writes that
because death entered the world through sin (Rom 5:12), “death has reigned from
the time of Adam” (Rom 5:14). So, too,
the opposite state is clear: to be reconciled by grace back to the Source of
Life results in eternal life. How could
it not?4 This simple truth is
the heart of atonement message of the Good News. Those who are reconciled to God now have life
now. They do not die, go to heaven, and THEN get eternal life. They are now
members of the Kingdom of God. As Paul
would say, they are now under the reign of the Spirit and life (see Romans
5-6).
Lord, apart from you, I have nothing, I am nothing, I have no hope.
I am dead. However, I praise and worship you that solely
by your grace, you have taken me back into relationship with you, into Life! Help me to share that message of restored
life with others. Amen.
------
1. For an introduction to this short series on Gen 1-3, see Nov.
22, 2024, “Misreadings in Genesis 1-3: Background.”
2. The specific temptation and the Tree of the Knowledge of Good
and Evil will be explained in the next post.
3. The Gospels preserve this view of the nature of man in Greek:
When Jesus’ dies on the cross, having made his last cry, he breathes out his
spirit (e.g. Matt 27:50); he “expires.”
4. I recognize that it is problematic to introduce this OT concept
of the nature of humanity in a “devotional” and not explore the implications
further regarding judgement. In brief, I
will note that pop-level Christian readings of eschatological texts about
judgement tend to face three problems: 1) not understanding what the figurative
and symbolic language used meant in the first century AD, 2) foisting the Greek
notion of an eternal soul into the texts, and 3) not recognizing that the Greek
terms “Hades” and “Gehenna” had distinct meanings in the first century. In regard to the last item: our earliest
Anglo-Saxon translations (c. 10th century) translated both Greek
terms by the same word (“hell” in English) and, by conflating them, created a foreign
construct. I discuss these issues in a
couple of academic articles: Duke,
Rodney, "Eternal Torment or Destruction? Interpreting Final Judgment
Texts," Evangelical Quarterly 88.3 (2016/17) 237-58 and "The
Idiom of 'Weeping and Gnashing of Teeth' in the Gospels: A Funerary
Formula" Perspectives in Religious Studies 47/3 (2020) 283–98.
Well done as always, brother. For my general agreement that this is not a "fall" story see my God and Human Wholeness, p. 37 and footnotes. Theologically the elimination of Gen 3 as a fall story and of the theory of a "fallen" human nature has immense implications that have yet to be fruitfully explored.
ReplyDeleteYes! Thank you. I say just a little more in the next post, but do not develop the implications. Maybe a later post?
Delete