I confess that it is unusual to write a "devotion" on the topic of abortion, but trying to understand what the Bible does and does not clarify sometimes leads me to greater humility and prayerfulness.
Issue
Most people who value the authority of the Bible seek for guidance
on the issue of human life and abortion. An early Jewish interpretation of the
Hebrew Bible (Old Testament) was that ensoulment/personhood began when the
birthed child first drew breath. That is because the Hebrew word that we
translate as "soul" (nephesh) refers to breathing beings. (This
understanding makes sense but is not based on any clear biblical text
addressing abortion.) Another understanding followed by Christians for several
centuries was that ensoulment began at "quickening" (the first
movement felt in the womb) at about 15 weeks after conception. (This position
is based on there being dualistic separation of body and soul that is not in
accord with Genesis 2.)
Today, however, there is a movement
that believes personhood begins at conception. Those who defend it point to
verses that speak of God's involvement in the womb. The problem is that they
are reading a modern concept into the Bible. Proper biblical interpretation
first starts with understanding what such texts communicated to the original
people of faith and then seeks to apply them to today. The form of most of
those texts is poetry using hyperbole. They were intended to make a point that
would not have been understood literally. The main contextual content was
generally an expression of wonderment at God's personal involvement in one's
life "from the beginning." The communicative intention was not to
teach biology.
Sample Texts Cited*
Here are some biblical examples regarding the womb:
Figuratively expressed, the
Israelites understood that God could “open” or “close” a womb to fulfill his
promises (Gen 20:18: 29:31). They could see any “fruitful womb” as a blessing.
However, the Bible nowhere teaches a divine determinism about all wombs. (As we
know, many zygotes never successfully lead to births.)
Job’s language of God “making” and
“forming” people in the womb (Job 31:15) is not teaching that embryonic
development is a hands-on activity by God, but was expressing the principle
that all human life comes from God. Job was poetically giving his reason for
treating his servants justly (Job 31:13-15).
Psalm 139:13-14, speaks of the
wonder of being formed in the womb by God, but the thrust of the psalm is about
how nothing is unknown or hidden from God who is beyond our sense of time and space. Although this is beautiful theology, it was
not intended as a science lesson.
The prophet Jeremiah expresses how
God told him he had set him aside and called him to be a prophet from the womb
(Jer 1:4-5). The language here is poetic and is a way to say, “from as early as
possible.” Jeremiah even plays off this language later when he complains that
he would have chosen not to come out of the womb, if he had known what trouble
his prophetic role would bring him (20:18). The main point is that Jeremiah was
called by God. We should note, too, how Paul uses Jeremiah’s language. Paul,
who as an adult was responsible for putting Christians to death, could still
refer to himself as set apart by God in his mother’s womb for the purpose he
later was fulfilling (Gal 1:15).
Therefore, these texts taught such
things as divine involvement going well back in time in one's life to call
people to fulfill God’s promises, to promote the value of all people, to
express awe and wonder about human formation, to project one’s sense of
belonging to God, etc. It is important to note that these texts are neither
teaching universal determinism beginning in the womb nor modern biological
science about human development. Moreover, they are not addressing the modern
understanding of conception. (It was not even known to modern people until the
1800's that women contributed genetic material to the process.) The ancient
Israelites thought of procreation agriculturally in terms of a seed being
planted in the womb and eventually growing into the "fruit" of a birthed
person.
Science
If we turn to modern science for help, we find that the zygote is a
stem cell that can keep multiplying and dividing theoretically into any number
of human beings. When, then is it a person? When stem cells reach a certain
cluster? When they begin to specialize? When organs are formed? When there is a
rudimentary nervous system? When the fetus is viable? When there is
consciousness? (Who knows when one can become aware of the presence of God?)
Reflection and Application
I wish I had THE answer to when the “fruit of the womb” is a “person”
before God, but neither the Bible nor current science provides a definitive
answer. What I do know is that neither supports personhood beginning at
conception. Science also leads me to push inward from the other side of the
birth spectrum to value the unborn child before birth. My ignorance leads me toward
a humility to be gracious toward the mothers faced with difficult decisions and
for me to be slow to judge. I understand how honest, deeply thoughtful, and
prayerful people may well come to different conclusions. I will have to trust
such people to do the best that they can do before God, as I am trying to do.
Lord, guide those who face pressing circumstances about whether or
not to bring a pregnancy to term. Bless them. Take care of them, and may as
many of those unborn be brought into fruition as possible within your will.
Amen.
---
*Exodus 21:22-23, a text
that has been appealed to by those both for and against abortion, further
complicates the issue by its difficult textual and exegetical problems. At best
it can be said that it is not about intentional abortion. Whether or not it
clarifies the legal value of a fetus is understandably debated.
No comments:
Post a Comment